Merel Hoedt vs Magdalena Baniak Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Jul at 10:57 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Hoedt vs M. Baniak

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

POL
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hoedt 1 - 0 Baniak
They have played 3 sets in total, with Merel Hoedt winning 2 and Magdalena Baniak winning 1. The last match between Merel Hoedt and Magdalena Baniak was at the W15 Grodzisk Mazowiecki, 10-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Merel Hoedt getting the victory 6-3 6-7(4) 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hoedt | 1 |
| Baniak | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Grodzisk Mazowiecki(07-10-25)
M. Hoedt vs M. Baniak H2H Profile
M. Hoedt vs M. Baniak Match Preview:
- How do Baniak and Hoedt compare in second serve effectiveness? Hoedt outperforms Baniak slightly, winning 42.33% of points compared to Baniak's 39.57% over the past six months.
- Regarding return games, Hoedt also edges out Baniak, especially on first serve returns, winning 33.8% of points, while Baniak wins 28.44%.
- Under pressure, Hoedt shows more resilience, saving 47.85% of breakpoints compared to Baniak's 39.13%.
- In terms of match victories over the past year, Baniak leads with a 58.82% win rate, higher than Hoedt’s 47.92%.
- Both players share their best win percentage on Clay courts, with Baniak at 63% and Hoedt slightly lower at 56%.
- Baniak typically competes at Futures/ITF level with a 61.54% win rate, while Hoedt plays more at the Challenger level, holding a 48.48% success rate.
- When examining opponent quality, Baniak has faced opponents with a higher average rank of 215.94 compared to Hoedt's 414.15.
- In deciding sets, Baniak excels by winning 57% of the time, whereas Hoedt only wins 36% of those matches.
- Baniak's breakpoint conversion rate is 31.71%, lower than Hoedt's 41.13%, which could influence match dynamics during critical points.
Editorial Prediction (July 10, 2025, UTC):
In assessing the upcoming match, Hoedt shows slight advantages in second serve performance and first serve returns, which frequently correlate with overall match success. Moreover, Hoedt's ability to convert breakpoints at a higher rate could serve as a strategic edge during critical junctures of the game.
Despite this, Baniak's impressive win rate over the past year and experience against higher-ranked opponents provide a strong counterbalance in the prediction. Additionally, Baniak's superior performance in deciding sets bolsters their case if the match extends to a tense final set.
Given these factors, while both players exhibit distinctive strengths, Baniak's broader match win record, especially under pressure, suggests a slight edge. Hence, Baniak is predicted to be the more likely winner of the upcoming contest.
Merel Hoedt vs Magdalena Baniak Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Hoedt vs M. Baniak H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 10 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:56:12 | Average Match Time | 2:56:12 |
| 68% (65/96) | 1st Serve % | 57% (62/109) |
| 60% (39/65) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (29/62) |
| 39% (12/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (22/47) |
| 45% (9/20) | Break Pts Won % | 44% (4/9) |
| 53% (58/109) | Return Points Win % | 47% (45/96) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Hoedt Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | ||
SF | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
QF | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
M. Baniak Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 6-0 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||

M. Hoedt vs M. Baniak Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.18% (201/170) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.50% (21/19) |
| 53.77% (449/386) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.33% (48/42) |
| 52.42% (3910/3549) | Games Win/Loss | 52.20% (428/392) |
| 51.75% (59/55) | Hard Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 56.28% (130/101) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.56% (20/16) |
| 48.00% (12/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 381 | Aces Total | 17 |
| 0.56 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 2042 | Total Double Faults | 75 |
| 1:39:21 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 472.98 | Average Opponent Rank | 254.47 |
| 64% (14256/22204) | 1st Serve % | 52% (569/1102) |
| 60% (8524/14256) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (349/569) |
| 42% (3307/7948) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (230/533) |
| 50% (1546/3078) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 54% (51/95) |
| 48% (10944/22612) | Return Points Win % | 44% (420/959) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.50% (84/76) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (5/5) |
| 55.71% (117/93) | Futures W/L | 53.33% (16/14) |
| 54% (194/362) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (21/40) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (29/62) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
| 47% (47/100) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (4/10) |
| 85% (204/174) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (23/19) |
| 13% (204/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (23/4) |
| 14% (167/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (17/2) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets
